🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to safeguard females from violence, including family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the procedure of exiting from the convention. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major setback for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent vote has sparked widespread outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the legislation for additional review if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty requires particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable discussions in other EU countries