🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear he could survive defeat by Grimsby. He weathered an important European final against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach came at the executive and appears to have failed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind that the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

A Tactical Conflict Over System & Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Power In the Throne

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

A New Football Hierarchy: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the system coach only to fire him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later bin them for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.