🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our kids' childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to pass a bill lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a useful first step," said the parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "based on robust research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create products and services that are safe and suitable for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state government level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced laws mandating guardian approval for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from certain politicians to mimic Australia's path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion evolves, the actions of Australia and others show that governments globally are no longer prepared to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.